Monday, Oct 03, 2022

'A Landmark In The History Of Our Bilateral Ties'

The Prime Minister's interview to Ha'Aretz (Israel) on Sept 8 on Israeli PM Sharon's visit and Indo-Israeli ties.

'A Landmark In The History Of Our Bilateral Ties'
'A Landmark In The History Of Our Bilateral Ties'

Ha'Aretz (Israel): India established full-fledged diplomatic relations with Israel in 1992. What were the reasons for taking this decision then? Would it be fair to say that the Indian national movement had reservations against the Zionist movement?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : India recognized Israel in September 1950. We have had an Israeli Consulate in Mumbai for many decades. The establishment of full diplomatic relations with Israel in 1992 followed events widely recognized as a turning point in the history of the Middle East.

The interaction between the people of India and the Jewish diaspora has a long history, dating back to the 1st century A.D. Two communities of the Jewish people in India even trace their roots to the ten 'lost tribes' of Israel. The story of the Jewish diaspora in India has been uniformly positive. India is one of very few countries in the world, which has never had a trace of anti-Semitism at any time in its history. The people of India were deeply anguished at the holocaust visited upon the Jewish people during the Second World War. If there were any reservations about the Zionist Movement, they were about some of the means adopted by the movement.

I believe India and Israel should focus on building bilateral relations on the basis of shared perspectives and commonalities between our two democracies. This has to be a forward-looking exercise, rather than harking back to perceptions of the past.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : Many people compare India's struggle against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism with Israel's struggle against Palestinian terrorism. Is this a valid comparison? Can your position on not negotiating with Pakistan until acts of terror cease be compared to Israel's decision not to implement the roadmap until Palestinian terrorism ceases?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : India has a consistent and well-known position on terrorism. We oppose all acts of terrorism, wherever they occur. We have repeatedly said that no cause can justify violence and destruction, particularly aimed at civilians.

The circumstances under which we in India are tackling the menace of cross-border terrorism are different from the situation prevailing in the Middle East. But we do not really need to make comparisons.

Our objective should be to firmly deal with terrorism and its sponsors, financiers and arms suppliers. At the same time, our doors should always be open for processes which would restore peace, development and progress to societies which have been devastated by terrorism over many generations.

This has been our approach in India. We have said that for us to agree to a substantive dialogue on outstanding bilateral issues, Pakistan needs to show sincerity by ending cross-border terrorism. Meanwhile, we continue to make every effort to promote economic cooperation, cultural exchanges and people-to-people links, so that a conducive climate is created for a fruitful dialogue if and when stoppage of terrorism permits the commencement of the dialogues.

It is well-known that India welcomed the 'Roadmap' proposed by the Quartet, in the hope that it would guide the region away from violence and lead to the realization of the vision of two independent states of Israel and Palestine, coexisting in peace, within secure borders. It would, of course, be the actions of the governments and peoples of the region, which would determine how best this roadmap can be implemented.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : The visit of Prime Minister Sharon is seen in Israel as an opportunity to deepen and expand bilateral cooperation. What are the priority areas of bilateral cooperation for India? Is defence the only area of interest, or are there other equally important areas?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : You have correctly described the visit of Prime Minister Sharon as an opportunity for deepening and expanding bilateral cooperation. We see this first visit to India of a Prime Minister of Israel as a landmark in the history of our bilateral ties.

India-Israel relations have acquired a multi-dimensional character, particularly over the last decade. While our defence cooperation is substantial and growing, we have also a lot to share with each other in agricultural sciences, in high technology - including Information Technology, in peaceful applications of space technologies, etc. India has benefited from Israel's world famous expertise in agricultural technologies. India is now Israel's second biggest trade partner in Asia, and the largest item of our trade is actually gems and jewellery. Tourism is another area with great potential, as is culture, since both our countries are host to some of mankind's greatest historic and cultural treasures.

I am confident that the visit of Prime Minister Sharon will raise our bilateral relationship to an entirely new level of cooperation.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : Israel cooperates in the field of defence with both China and India. There are those who feel that Israel could consider the possibility of defence cooperation with Pakistan. If such cooperation develops, how would India react?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : I do not want to address hypothetical questions or presume to advise another country on its cooperation with a third country.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : What do you think are President Musharraf's hidden motivations when publicly declaring Pakistan's eventual readiness to recognize Israel?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : You have to address this question to President Musharraf.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : What is your attitude towards an eventual establishment of diplomatic relations between Israel and Pakistan?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : Sovereign countries are free to decide where their respective national interests lie.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : Pakistan claims to have developed weaponised nuclear capability, both for its national defence and for the Islamic nations. The existence of several extreme fundamentalist and terrorist organizations in Pakistan is well known. In the event that President Musharraf is replaced by an extremist regime, what would the consequences be for the world in general and for your region in particular?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : We have long known the reality of Pakistan's nuclear weapons capability, and the potential for its misuse. We have also been mindful of the depth to which fundamentalism and international terrorism have taken root in our neighbourhood. Political instability and a deficit of democracy in our region should be of great concern, not just to us, but also to the international community. Obviously, the impact of any such instability in our region is the most direct on India.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : In this connection, it is often argued that the possibility of a nuclear war is ruled out since both India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons. Would this theory of a balance of terror remain valid if extremists, who see the bomb as a means to eliminate "the enemies of God" were to gain control over the nuclear weapons?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : I do not want to speculate on nuclear theories or doomsday scenarios. I would only say that India developed its nuclear weapons in response to real concerns about its security environment and to maintain its strategic autonomy. We have acted most responsibly to minimize the possibility of a nuclear conflict in our region. Our nuclear doctrine is based on an explicit no-first-use policy. We have publicly stated our willingness to sign a no-first-use agreement regionally or internationally. Our nuclear deterrent is entirely defensive in nature and, most importantly, it is under firm civilian control.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : In Israel, Iran is seen as a country governed by fundamentalists, who actively support Islamic terrorist groups while rapidly developing a nuclear capability. Why is India indifferent to the threat from such a regime?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : We view our relations with Iran, based on our own historical experiences. We have a tradition of friendly interaction with that country in a variety of fields, including trade and commerce, culture and energy. We believe that our cooperative, mutually beneficial relations with Iran are a factor of peace, stability and moderation in our region.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : Over the past few years, the United States has established a physical presence in your region. It has bases in Pakistan now. How does India evaluate the American presence in this part of the world?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : Our relationship with USA has undergone a qualitative transformation in recent years. A part of this process is regular and candid discussions on political and security issues of mutual concern in India's extended neighbourhood, to harmonise our respective approaches, and to remain mindful of each other's interests. We share many common interests in the region, including combating terrorism, and in the evolution of stable, moderate, prosperous and democratic states in our extended neighbourhood.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : The US policy of sanctions on arms exports often appears contradictory. Sometimes, it seems as if American restrictions on arms exports from third countries that receive US assistance is not merely motivated by a desire to protect their own industries. At other times, their policy seems restrictive. For instance, while Israel's efforts to export the Phalcon system to China was stopped, the veto was lifted in favour of India. Yet USA blocked Indian efforts to obtain the Israeli Arrow missile system. How does India react to these developments?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : I will not dwell on specific contracts or issues here. After the United States lifted sanctions on India in September 2001, our governments have been addressing this issue of liberalizing the regime for trade in high-technology defence systems. We have made some progress and are hopeful that our regular dialogue will clear up the remaining hurdles in this process.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : In retrospect, how does India see the war in Iraq now, nearly six months after it started? How do you see the arguments put forward by USA and UK in support of the war? What would India's reaction be if the Americans were to extend their Iraq policy to countries like Iran, Syria, and even to North Korea?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : From the start, India had hoped that the issue would be resolved peacefully through diplomatic efforts and that war would be avoided. We were therefore disappointed at the outbreak of war. That is behind us now. Iraq now faces enormous challenges, ranging from security to reconstruction to the peaceful restoration of sovereignty to its people. We hope the international community can come together to address those challenges effectively. There must be a central role for the UN in this endeavour. It would be unwise to see parallels of Iraq in other countries of the region.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : Would India be ready to send troops to assist the Americans in Iraq, if the US obtains U.N. sanction?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : We have made our position on this quite clear. Our decision on this would depend, inter alia, on factors involving our national security interests, India's connections with the region, the role of the United Nations in Iraq and the contours of the political process in that country.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : At the present pace of population growth, India will soon surpass China to become the world's most populous country. For years, China has been implementing a very harsh policy of limiting its birth-rate. Could this policy eventually be adopted in India?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : In actual fact, India was one of the first countries in the world to launch a national family planning programme. Our population control strategy is based on our belief that durable change can only be achieved when people are themselves convinced of the need for it. Therefore our focus is on spreading literacy, education and awareness - particularly among women - improving maternal and neo-natal health care, and working for the empowerment of women. We still have a long way to go, but we have already achieved significant results in controlling population growth.

Ha'Aretz (Israel) : India's relations with Israel have developed enormously in the 12 years since diplomatic ties were established. At the same time, India has maintained its profound traditional friendship with the Arab world. Would this unique position inspire India to play a role as a mediator in the Middle East conflict?

Atal Behari Vajpayee : As I observed earlier, India has consistently worked for a just and durable peace in the Middle East. We are happy to enjoy traditional ties of friendship with the Arab countries. Our cooperation with Israel has developed very satisfactorily. While we believe that this can contribute to relationships in the region, we do not believe that this means the role of a mediator.


Outlook Newsletters


Read More from Outlook

Lament Of Separation: Songs Of Habba Khatun, Last Queen Of Kashmir, Still Echo In Valley

Lament Of Separation: Songs Of Habba Khatun, Last Queen Of Kashmir, Still Echo In Valley

In happy times and sad, Habba Khatun’s sensuous songs make both young and old emotional. With the never-ending conflict bringing tragedies to every doorstep, Habba’s lyrics of separation amplify their mourning.

How Indian Laws Govern People’s Right To Love And Live

How Indian Laws Govern People’s Right To Love And Live

In India, only those relationships between a man and a woman are considered to be legitimate when there is a marriage between the two.

Kohli Quits Test Captaincy, Leaves Leadership Vacuum

Kohli Quits Test Captaincy, Leaves Leadership Vacuum

Virat Kohli, 33, had recently stepped down as India's T20I captain and was subsequently removed as the ODI captain.

UP Elections 2022: How Congress Is Harnessing Power Of 'Persecuted' Women To Counter BJP

UP Elections 2022: How Congress Is Harnessing Power Of 'Persecuted' Women To Counter BJP

A Mahila Congress leader, who is the face of the ‘Ladki Hoon, Lad Sakti Hoon’ campaign, however, has accused the party of anti-women bias after she was denied a ticket.